Review





Similar Products

94
Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank mouse anti glial fibrillary acidic protein gfap antibody
Mouse Anti Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Gfap Antibody, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti glial fibrillary acidic protein gfap antibody/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti glial fibrillary acidic protein gfap antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Servicebio Inc mouse anti gfap antibodies
FGF4 was suggested as a potential core regulator of neuronal glycolysis in CCI rats. ( A ) Heat map of differentially expressed genes. n = 4. ( B ) Ranking the top 20 differentially expressed genes in ascending order of q-value. ( C ) Construct a protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed genes through STRING online analysis database. ( D ) Based on the global PPI network ( C ), topological analysis using Cytoscape identified FGF4 as a hub gene. For clarity, the predicted interaction lines between FGF4 and key glycolytic genes (HIF-1α, HK2, LDHA, PGK1), as well as between HIF-1α and key glycolytic genes (HK2, LDHA, PGK1), were highlighted in red. ( E ), ( F ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in sciatic nerve and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( G ) qRT-PCR showing the expression of FGF4 mRNA in sciatic nerve. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( H ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green)/NeuN (red), FGF4 <t>(green)/GFAP</t> (red) and <t>FGF4</t> <t>(green)/Iba1</t> (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 20 μm. ( I ), ( L ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in dorsal horn of spinal cord and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( J ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green) and NeuN (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 200 μm, 50 μm. ( K ) Quantitative analysis of mean fluorescence intensity of FGF4 in neurons. n = 4. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Columns represent the mean ± SD. $$ p < 0.01 vs. the S group
Mouse Anti Gfap Antibodies, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti gfap antibodies/product/Servicebio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti gfap antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Lifetech Scientific Corporation mouse anti gfap
FGF4 was suggested as a potential core regulator of neuronal glycolysis in CCI rats. ( A ) Heat map of differentially expressed genes. n = 4. ( B ) Ranking the top 20 differentially expressed genes in ascending order of q-value. ( C ) Construct a protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed genes through STRING online analysis database. ( D ) Based on the global PPI network ( C ), topological analysis using Cytoscape identified FGF4 as a hub gene. For clarity, the predicted interaction lines between FGF4 and key glycolytic genes (HIF-1α, HK2, LDHA, PGK1), as well as between HIF-1α and key glycolytic genes (HK2, LDHA, PGK1), were highlighted in red. ( E ), ( F ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in sciatic nerve and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( G ) qRT-PCR showing the expression of FGF4 mRNA in sciatic nerve. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( H ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green)/NeuN (red), FGF4 <t>(green)/GFAP</t> (red) and <t>FGF4</t> <t>(green)/Iba1</t> (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 20 μm. ( I ), ( L ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in dorsal horn of spinal cord and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( J ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green) and NeuN (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 200 μm, 50 μm. ( K ) Quantitative analysis of mean fluorescence intensity of FGF4 in neurons. n = 4. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Columns represent the mean ± SD. $$ p < 0.01 vs. the S group
Mouse Anti Gfap, supplied by Lifetech Scientific Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti gfap/product/Lifetech Scientific Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti gfap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Cell Signaling Technology Inc mouse monoclonal anti gfap antibody
FGF4 was suggested as a potential core regulator of neuronal glycolysis in CCI rats. ( A ) Heat map of differentially expressed genes. n = 4. ( B ) Ranking the top 20 differentially expressed genes in ascending order of q-value. ( C ) Construct a protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed genes through STRING online analysis database. ( D ) Based on the global PPI network ( C ), topological analysis using Cytoscape identified FGF4 as a hub gene. For clarity, the predicted interaction lines between FGF4 and key glycolytic genes (HIF-1α, HK2, LDHA, PGK1), as well as between HIF-1α and key glycolytic genes (HK2, LDHA, PGK1), were highlighted in red. ( E ), ( F ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in sciatic nerve and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( G ) qRT-PCR showing the expression of FGF4 mRNA in sciatic nerve. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( H ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green)/NeuN (red), FGF4 <t>(green)/GFAP</t> (red) and <t>FGF4</t> <t>(green)/Iba1</t> (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 20 μm. ( I ), ( L ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in dorsal horn of spinal cord and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( J ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green) and NeuN (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 200 μm, 50 μm. ( K ) Quantitative analysis of mean fluorescence intensity of FGF4 in neurons. n = 4. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Columns represent the mean ± SD. $$ p < 0.01 vs. the S group
Mouse Monoclonal Anti Gfap Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti gfap antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal anti gfap antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mouse gfap
FGF4 was suggested as a potential core regulator of neuronal glycolysis in CCI rats. ( A ) Heat map of differentially expressed genes. n = 4. ( B ) Ranking the top 20 differentially expressed genes in ascending order of q-value. ( C ) Construct a protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed genes through STRING online analysis database. ( D ) Based on the global PPI network ( C ), topological analysis using Cytoscape identified FGF4 as a hub gene. For clarity, the predicted interaction lines between FGF4 and key glycolytic genes (HIF-1α, HK2, LDHA, PGK1), as well as between HIF-1α and key glycolytic genes (HK2, LDHA, PGK1), were highlighted in red. ( E ), ( F ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in sciatic nerve and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( G ) qRT-PCR showing the expression of FGF4 mRNA in sciatic nerve. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( H ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green)/NeuN (red), FGF4 <t>(green)/GFAP</t> (red) and <t>FGF4</t> <t>(green)/Iba1</t> (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 20 μm. ( I ), ( L ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in dorsal horn of spinal cord and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( J ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green) and NeuN (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 200 μm, 50 μm. ( K ) Quantitative analysis of mean fluorescence intensity of FGF4 in neurons. n = 4. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Columns represent the mean ± SD. $$ p < 0.01 vs. the S group
Anti Mouse Gfap, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse gfap/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse gfap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Cell Signaling Technology Inc glial fibrillary acidic protein
The KIBRA and p -PKMζ are activated in contralateral ACC neurons after CPTP. (A-F) Representative blots and columnar statistical charts show KIBRA, p -PKMζ, and PKMζ levels in contralateral ACC at different time points in Thoracotomy pain (A-C) or Thoracotomy no pain (D-F), * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 vs Sham group; the data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test, n = 4∼7 rats in each group. (G-H) The photographs of the double immunofluorescence staining show that KIBRA and p -PKMζ are only colocalized with neuron markers (NeuN) but not with astrocyte marker <t>(GFAP)</t> and microglia marker (Iba1) in the Sham and CPTP groups. The white arrowheads indicate the co-immunostaining. Scale bar, 100 μm. ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CPTP, chronic post-thoracotomy pain; GFAP, glial <t>fibrillary</t> acidic protein; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; KIBRA, kidney and brain-expressed protein; NeuN, neuron-specific nuclear protein; PKMζ, protein kinase Mζ; p -PKMζ, phosphorylated protein kinase Mζ.
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/glial fibrillary acidic protein/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glial fibrillary acidic protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Cell Signaling Technology Inc gfap antibody
The KIBRA and p -PKMζ are activated in contralateral ACC neurons after CPTP. (A-F) Representative blots and columnar statistical charts show KIBRA, p -PKMζ, and PKMζ levels in contralateral ACC at different time points in Thoracotomy pain (A-C) or Thoracotomy no pain (D-F), * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 vs Sham group; the data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test, n = 4∼7 rats in each group. (G-H) The photographs of the double immunofluorescence staining show that KIBRA and p -PKMζ are only colocalized with neuron markers (NeuN) but not with astrocyte marker <t>(GFAP)</t> and microglia marker (Iba1) in the Sham and CPTP groups. The white arrowheads indicate the co-immunostaining. Scale bar, 100 μm. ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CPTP, chronic post-thoracotomy pain; GFAP, glial <t>fibrillary</t> acidic protein; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; KIBRA, kidney and brain-expressed protein; NeuN, neuron-specific nuclear protein; PKMζ, protein kinase Mζ; p -PKMζ, phosphorylated protein kinase Mζ.
Gfap Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gfap antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gfap antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
AvesLabs mouse anti gfap
The KIBRA and p -PKMζ are activated in contralateral ACC neurons after CPTP. (A-F) Representative blots and columnar statistical charts show KIBRA, p -PKMζ, and PKMζ levels in contralateral ACC at different time points in Thoracotomy pain (A-C) or Thoracotomy no pain (D-F), * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 vs Sham group; the data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test, n = 4∼7 rats in each group. (G-H) The photographs of the double immunofluorescence staining show that KIBRA and p -PKMζ are only colocalized with neuron markers (NeuN) but not with astrocyte marker <t>(GFAP)</t> and microglia marker (Iba1) in the Sham and CPTP groups. The white arrowheads indicate the co-immunostaining. Scale bar, 100 μm. ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CPTP, chronic post-thoracotomy pain; GFAP, glial <t>fibrillary</t> acidic protein; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; KIBRA, kidney and brain-expressed protein; NeuN, neuron-specific nuclear protein; PKMζ, protein kinase Mζ; p -PKMζ, phosphorylated protein kinase Mζ.
Mouse Anti Gfap, supplied by AvesLabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti gfap/product/AvesLabs
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti gfap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Cell Signaling Technology Inc mouse anti gfap
The KIBRA and p -PKMζ are activated in contralateral ACC neurons after CPTP. (A-F) Representative blots and columnar statistical charts show KIBRA, p -PKMζ, and PKMζ levels in contralateral ACC at different time points in Thoracotomy pain (A-C) or Thoracotomy no pain (D-F), * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 vs Sham group; the data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test, n = 4∼7 rats in each group. (G-H) The photographs of the double immunofluorescence staining show that KIBRA and p -PKMζ are only colocalized with neuron markers (NeuN) but not with astrocyte marker <t>(GFAP)</t> and microglia marker (Iba1) in the Sham and CPTP groups. The white arrowheads indicate the co-immunostaining. Scale bar, 100 μm. ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CPTP, chronic post-thoracotomy pain; GFAP, glial <t>fibrillary</t> acidic protein; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; KIBRA, kidney and brain-expressed protein; NeuN, neuron-specific nuclear protein; PKMζ, protein kinase Mζ; p -PKMζ, phosphorylated protein kinase Mζ.
Mouse Anti Gfap, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti gfap/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti gfap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti gfap antibody
The KIBRA and p -PKMζ are activated in contralateral ACC neurons after CPTP. (A-F) Representative blots and columnar statistical charts show KIBRA, p -PKMζ, and PKMζ levels in contralateral ACC at different time points in Thoracotomy pain (A-C) or Thoracotomy no pain (D-F), * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 vs Sham group; the data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test, n = 4∼7 rats in each group. (G-H) The photographs of the double immunofluorescence staining show that KIBRA and p -PKMζ are only colocalized with neuron markers (NeuN) but not with astrocyte marker <t>(GFAP)</t> and microglia marker (Iba1) in the Sham and CPTP groups. The white arrowheads indicate the co-immunostaining. Scale bar, 100 μm. ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CPTP, chronic post-thoracotomy pain; GFAP, glial <t>fibrillary</t> acidic protein; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; KIBRA, kidney and brain-expressed protein; NeuN, neuron-specific nuclear protein; PKMζ, protein kinase Mζ; p -PKMζ, phosphorylated protein kinase Mζ.
Anti Gfap Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti gfap antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti gfap antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


FGF4 was suggested as a potential core regulator of neuronal glycolysis in CCI rats. ( A ) Heat map of differentially expressed genes. n = 4. ( B ) Ranking the top 20 differentially expressed genes in ascending order of q-value. ( C ) Construct a protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed genes through STRING online analysis database. ( D ) Based on the global PPI network ( C ), topological analysis using Cytoscape identified FGF4 as a hub gene. For clarity, the predicted interaction lines between FGF4 and key glycolytic genes (HIF-1α, HK2, LDHA, PGK1), as well as between HIF-1α and key glycolytic genes (HK2, LDHA, PGK1), were highlighted in red. ( E ), ( F ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in sciatic nerve and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( G ) qRT-PCR showing the expression of FGF4 mRNA in sciatic nerve. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( H ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green)/NeuN (red), FGF4 (green)/GFAP (red) and FGF4 (green)/Iba1 (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 20 μm. ( I ), ( L ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in dorsal horn of spinal cord and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( J ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green) and NeuN (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 200 μm, 50 μm. ( K ) Quantitative analysis of mean fluorescence intensity of FGF4 in neurons. n = 4. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Columns represent the mean ± SD. $$ p < 0.01 vs. the S group

Journal: The Journal of Headache and Pain

Article Title: Effects of FGF4/HIF-1α axis-mediated neuronal glycolysis on neuropathic pain

doi: 10.1186/s10194-026-02362-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: FGF4 was suggested as a potential core regulator of neuronal glycolysis in CCI rats. ( A ) Heat map of differentially expressed genes. n = 4. ( B ) Ranking the top 20 differentially expressed genes in ascending order of q-value. ( C ) Construct a protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed genes through STRING online analysis database. ( D ) Based on the global PPI network ( C ), topological analysis using Cytoscape identified FGF4 as a hub gene. For clarity, the predicted interaction lines between FGF4 and key glycolytic genes (HIF-1α, HK2, LDHA, PGK1), as well as between HIF-1α and key glycolytic genes (HK2, LDHA, PGK1), were highlighted in red. ( E ), ( F ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in sciatic nerve and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( G ) qRT-PCR showing the expression of FGF4 mRNA in sciatic nerve. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( H ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green)/NeuN (red), FGF4 (green)/GFAP (red) and FGF4 (green)/Iba1 (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 20 μm. ( I ), ( L ) Protein expression levels of FGF4 in dorsal horn of spinal cord and quantification data of the expression of FGF4/GAPDH in each group. n = 6. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ( J ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green) and NeuN (red) in the spinal dorsal horn. Scale bars, 200 μm, 50 μm. ( K ) Quantitative analysis of mean fluorescence intensity of FGF4 in neurons. n = 4. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Columns represent the mean ± SD. $$ p < 0.01 vs. the S group

Article Snippet: Mouse anti-Iba1 and mouse anti-GFAP antibodies were purchased from Servicebio (China).

Techniques: Construct, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence

Intrathecal injection of FGF4-AAV increased the pain threshold of CCI rats and inhibited the expression of HIF-1α in neurons. ( A ) Schematics of AAV constructs overexpressing FGF4 or control. EGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein; CMV, cytomegalovirus promoter; ITR, inverted terminal repeats. ( B ) Schematic diagram of experimental procedure. ( C ) Schematic diagram of AAV intrathecal injection. ( D ) Colocalization of EGFP (green) and NeuN (red), EGFP (green) and GFAP (red), and EGFP (green) and Iba1 (red) in L4-6 spinal cord segments. scale bar, 200 μm, 20 μm. ( E ) FGF4 + NeuN + , FGF4 + GFAP + and FGF4 + Iba1 + percentage statistics. ( F ) Thermal withdrawal latency (TWL). n = 15. Data were analyzed by repeated measures two-way ANOVA (Group × Day) with Bonferroni’s post-hoc tests. ( G ) Mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT). n = 15. Data were analyzed by repeated measures two-way ANOVA (Group × Day) with Bonferroni’s post-hoc tests. ( H ), ( I ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green)/NeuN (red) and HIF-1α (green)/NeuN (red). Scale bars, 200 μm, 50 μm. ( J ), ( K ) Quantitative analysis of mean fluorescence intensity of FGF4 and HIF-1α in neurons. n = 4. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s or Dunnett’s post-hoc tests. Columns represent the mean ± SD. ## p < 0.01 vs. the M + NC-AAV group

Journal: The Journal of Headache and Pain

Article Title: Effects of FGF4/HIF-1α axis-mediated neuronal glycolysis on neuropathic pain

doi: 10.1186/s10194-026-02362-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: Intrathecal injection of FGF4-AAV increased the pain threshold of CCI rats and inhibited the expression of HIF-1α in neurons. ( A ) Schematics of AAV constructs overexpressing FGF4 or control. EGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein; CMV, cytomegalovirus promoter; ITR, inverted terminal repeats. ( B ) Schematic diagram of experimental procedure. ( C ) Schematic diagram of AAV intrathecal injection. ( D ) Colocalization of EGFP (green) and NeuN (red), EGFP (green) and GFAP (red), and EGFP (green) and Iba1 (red) in L4-6 spinal cord segments. scale bar, 200 μm, 20 μm. ( E ) FGF4 + NeuN + , FGF4 + GFAP + and FGF4 + Iba1 + percentage statistics. ( F ) Thermal withdrawal latency (TWL). n = 15. Data were analyzed by repeated measures two-way ANOVA (Group × Day) with Bonferroni’s post-hoc tests. ( G ) Mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT). n = 15. Data were analyzed by repeated measures two-way ANOVA (Group × Day) with Bonferroni’s post-hoc tests. ( H ), ( I ) Immunohistochemistry of FGF4 (green)/NeuN (red) and HIF-1α (green)/NeuN (red). Scale bars, 200 μm, 50 μm. ( J ), ( K ) Quantitative analysis of mean fluorescence intensity of FGF4 and HIF-1α in neurons. n = 4. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s or Dunnett’s post-hoc tests. Columns represent the mean ± SD. ## p < 0.01 vs. the M + NC-AAV group

Article Snippet: Mouse anti-Iba1 and mouse anti-GFAP antibodies were purchased from Servicebio (China).

Techniques: Injection, Expressing, Construct, Control, Fluorescence, Immunohistochemistry

The KIBRA and p -PKMζ are activated in contralateral ACC neurons after CPTP. (A-F) Representative blots and columnar statistical charts show KIBRA, p -PKMζ, and PKMζ levels in contralateral ACC at different time points in Thoracotomy pain (A-C) or Thoracotomy no pain (D-F), * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 vs Sham group; the data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test, n = 4∼7 rats in each group. (G-H) The photographs of the double immunofluorescence staining show that KIBRA and p -PKMζ are only colocalized with neuron markers (NeuN) but not with astrocyte marker (GFAP) and microglia marker (Iba1) in the Sham and CPTP groups. The white arrowheads indicate the co-immunostaining. Scale bar, 100 μm. ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CPTP, chronic post-thoracotomy pain; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; KIBRA, kidney and brain-expressed protein; NeuN, neuron-specific nuclear protein; PKMζ, protein kinase Mζ; p -PKMζ, phosphorylated protein kinase Mζ.

Journal: Pain

Article Title: Kidney and brain-expressed protein upregulation in the anterior cingulate cortex mediates chronic post-thoracotomy pain by the phospho-protein kinase Mζ/glutamate receptor 1 signaling pathway and neuroinflammation in male rats

doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003849

Figure Lengend Snippet: The KIBRA and p -PKMζ are activated in contralateral ACC neurons after CPTP. (A-F) Representative blots and columnar statistical charts show KIBRA, p -PKMζ, and PKMζ levels in contralateral ACC at different time points in Thoracotomy pain (A-C) or Thoracotomy no pain (D-F), * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 vs Sham group; the data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test, n = 4∼7 rats in each group. (G-H) The photographs of the double immunofluorescence staining show that KIBRA and p -PKMζ are only colocalized with neuron markers (NeuN) but not with astrocyte marker (GFAP) and microglia marker (Iba1) in the Sham and CPTP groups. The white arrowheads indicate the co-immunostaining. Scale bar, 100 μm. ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CPTP, chronic post-thoracotomy pain; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; KIBRA, kidney and brain-expressed protein; NeuN, neuron-specific nuclear protein; PKMζ, protein kinase Mζ; p -PKMζ, phosphorylated protein kinase Mζ.

Article Snippet: Then the samples were dehydrated in 30% sucrose, and cut into slices at 35 μm for immunofluorescence with antibodies against KIBRA (bs-11570R; Bioss), GluR1 (ab174785; Abcam), p -PKMζ (sc174785; Santa Cruz), TNF-α (BS-1857; Bioworld), IL-1β (AF-401-NA; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), neuron-specific nuclear protein (NeuN, MAB377; Millipore, Burlington, VT), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, 3670s; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1, ab5076; Abcam), after incubation at 4°C overnight.

Techniques: Double Immunofluorescence Staining, Marker, Immunostaining, Binding Assay

GluR1 and neuroinflammation in ACC neurons are involved in CPTP. (A-F) Representative blots and columnar statistical charts show GluR1, TNF-α, and IL-1β levels in contralateral ACC at different time points in Thoracotomy pain (A-C) or Thoracotomy no pain group (D-F), * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 vs Sham group, the data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test, n = 5∼7 rats in each group. (G-I) The photographs of the double immunofluorescence staining show that GluR1, TNF-α, and IL-1β are only colocalized with neuron markers (NeuN) but not with astrocyte marker (GFAP) and microglia marker (Iba1) in the Sham and CPTP groups. The white arrowheads indicate the co-immunostaining: scale bar, 100 μm. ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CPTP, chronic post-thoracotomy pain; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GluR1, glutamate receptor 1; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; NeuN, neuron-specific nuclear protein; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

Journal: Pain

Article Title: Kidney and brain-expressed protein upregulation in the anterior cingulate cortex mediates chronic post-thoracotomy pain by the phospho-protein kinase Mζ/glutamate receptor 1 signaling pathway and neuroinflammation in male rats

doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003849

Figure Lengend Snippet: GluR1 and neuroinflammation in ACC neurons are involved in CPTP. (A-F) Representative blots and columnar statistical charts show GluR1, TNF-α, and IL-1β levels in contralateral ACC at different time points in Thoracotomy pain (A-C) or Thoracotomy no pain group (D-F), * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 vs Sham group, the data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test, n = 5∼7 rats in each group. (G-I) The photographs of the double immunofluorescence staining show that GluR1, TNF-α, and IL-1β are only colocalized with neuron markers (NeuN) but not with astrocyte marker (GFAP) and microglia marker (Iba1) in the Sham and CPTP groups. The white arrowheads indicate the co-immunostaining: scale bar, 100 μm. ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CPTP, chronic post-thoracotomy pain; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GluR1, glutamate receptor 1; Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; NeuN, neuron-specific nuclear protein; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

Article Snippet: Then the samples were dehydrated in 30% sucrose, and cut into slices at 35 μm for immunofluorescence with antibodies against KIBRA (bs-11570R; Bioss), GluR1 (ab174785; Abcam), p -PKMζ (sc174785; Santa Cruz), TNF-α (BS-1857; Bioworld), IL-1β (AF-401-NA; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), neuron-specific nuclear protein (NeuN, MAB377; Millipore, Burlington, VT), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, 3670s; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1, ab5076; Abcam), after incubation at 4°C overnight.

Techniques: Double Immunofluorescence Staining, Marker, Immunostaining, Binding Assay